Pounds v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of two counts each of rape, carnal knowledge, and incest. 1 On appeal to this court he alleges (1) that the trial court improperly admitted evidence of prior sexual contact between himself and the complainant; (2) that his conviction was not supported by adequate corroborative evidence; (3) that the trial court erred by failing to poll the jury and voir dire the jury a third time regarding prejudicial publicity; and (4) that his convictions for rape, carnal knowledge and incest merge. 2 We affirm.
I
At trial, the government presented the testimony of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
- Bracey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Toliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Battle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Street v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Groves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Fortune v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.