Legal Opinion

Pounds v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 12, 1987No. 85-214PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

After a jury trial, appellant was convicted of two counts each of rape, carnal knowledge, and incest. 1 On appeal to this court he alleges (1) that the trial court improperly admitted evidence of prior sexual contact between himself and the complainant; (2) that his conviction was not supported by adequate corroborative evidence; (3) that the trial court erred by failing to poll the jury and voir dire the jury a third time regarding prejudicial publicity; and (4) that his convictions for rape, carnal knowledge and incest merge. 2 We affirm.

I

At trial, the government presented the testimony of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  3. Watts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Bracey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
  5. Toliver v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Thompson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Battle v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Street v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Groves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Fortune v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API