Legal Opinion

Peyton v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 12, 1998No. 96-CF-903, 96-CF-993PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

These consolidated appeals present the question—one of first impression in this jurisdiction, though much-litigated elsewhere— whether the trial judge committed prejudicial error by refusing to declare a mistrial after a key prosecution witness , volunteered, during his redirect examination, that he had taken a “lie detector” test. The issue is a troubling one, for even an indirect reference to the administration of a polygraph examination has a substantial potential for prejudice. In this case, however, the trial judge’s prompt, thorough and effective admonition to…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. United States v. MechanikSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. Loud HawkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. Coleman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Klayman v. SegalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Harrison v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Anthony v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API