Legal Opinion
Ross v. City of New Haven
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 18, 1989No. 7432PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
This case comes before us, pursuant to Practice Book § 4147, by reservation of two questions of law from the trial court. The questions are: (1) “Is the city of New Haven obligated under the Connecticut General Statutes [§ 38-327] and Regulations to provide uninsured motorist benefits to operators of patrol cars it owns which are used by the city of New Haven’s department of police services, with respect to which it is self-insured?” and (2) “Does the city of New Haven’s status as employer of the plaintiff, John Ross, and the fact that the city of New Haven has paid workers’ compensation…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sharp v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Panaro v. Electrolux Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
3Cited by6 opinions
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Bouley v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- CNA Insurance Co. v. ColmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Bouley v. City of NorwichConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- CNA Insurance v. ColmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.