Legal Opinion
Good v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 18, 1996No. Civil Action 95-6102PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LOWELL A. REED, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiffs Charles Good and Carolyn Good (“Plaintiffs”) filed a personal injury action on July 7,1993 in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County seeking damages for injuries caused to Charles Good, which resulted from exposure to asbestos. Westinghouse Electric Corporation (‘Westinghouse”), one of the named defendants, filed a notice of removal in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1) on September 27, 1995.
Pending before this Court is the motion of plaintiffs to remand…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Willingham v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- International Primate Protection League v. Administrators of Tulane Educational FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Tennessee v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bennett v. MIS CORP.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Isaacson v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Alsup v. 3-Day Blinds, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2006
- Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglass CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Hagen v. Benjamin Foster Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.