Legal Opinion

Hall v. CSX Transp., Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 28, 1994No. 1921658PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a consolidated appeal from the rulings on three hearing loss claims brought by William L. Childs, Ernest S. Hall, and James R. Phillips against CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSX), under the Federal Employer's Liability Act (FELA).1 The Mobile Circuit Court entered a summary judgment in favor of CSX as to the claims of all three plaintiffs.

The dispositive issue is whether the trial court erred in holding that the evidence presented no genuine issue of material fact and, on that holding, entering a summary judgment for CSX as to these three claims.

A summary judgment is proper when there…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. David J. Fries v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
  3. Grider v. GriderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Chatham v. CSX Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  5. Ellingwood v. StevensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dean v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. CSX Transp., Inc. v. DansbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Rodgers v. AdamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  4. Broussard v. Union Pacific R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Wilkerson v. Burlington Northern RailroadCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API