Legal Opinion
Chatham v. CSX Transp., Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 22, 1993No. 1911147PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
This Court's opinion of December 11, 1992, is withdrawn and the following opinion is substituted therefor.
William Chatham appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of CSX Transportation, Inc. Chatham filed a complaint against CSX in 1990 under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51-60, for damages for a loss of hearing he claimed to have incurred while he was employed by CSX as a carman. CSX moved for a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Bass v. SOUTHTRUST BANK OF BALDWIN CTY.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Donald D. Fletcher v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- McGowan v. Chrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- Kelly v. Connecticut Mut. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
- Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Elizabeth Homes, LLC v. CatoSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- McGough v. G & A, INC.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.