Legal Opinion

Widmer Brewing Co. v. Rolph

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 29, 1994No. 9207-04599; CA A79936PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against defendants for breach of contract, breach of a joint venture agreement and fraud. Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendants on all three claims. We affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the record shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47C; Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 699, 588 P2d 1100 (1978). We view the evidence and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the nonmoving…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. SwainOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Hayes v. KillingerOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Rosenkrantz v. BardeOregon Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Logan v. TiegsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Roselius v. HoehneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API