Legal Opinion

Roselius v. Hoehne

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 30, 1997No. 92 CV 255; CA A83279Published

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendants declaring defendants’ interest in one partnership and winding up the affairs of two other partnerships. We review the court’s findings de novo, ORS 19.125(3), and affirm.

The disputes between the parties arose from a series of transactions involving the acquisition of two motels and a restaurant in Port Orford, Oregon. Defendants met plaintiffs in December 1985 when defendants were the managers of the Neptune Motel in Port Orford. Plaintiffs were members of the Port Orford Properties Limited Partnership - II (POPPII) that was then considering…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. ELDRIDGE v. JohnstonOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Dan Bunn, Inc. v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Widmer Brewing Co. v. RolphCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API