Legal Opinion

Crespin v. Shewry

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 2004No. A104418PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MARGULIES, J.

In 1993, plaintiffs obtained a permanent injunction requiring that the California Department of Health Services (DHS) provide certain restricted Medi-Cal benefits to undocumented aliens. A judgment incorporating the injunction’s major elements became final in 1994, following DHS’s appeal. In 1997 and 2000, DHS moved unsuccessfully for orders dissolving or modifying portions of the injunction. In 2003, plaintiffs applied for and were awarded attorney fees and expenses under the private attorney general statute for successfully defending the permanent injunction. DHS…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Sontag Chain Stores Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Trans-Action Commercial Investors, Ltd. v. Firmaterr, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Crespin v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Alan v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Carpenter v. JACK IN THE BOX CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. North Beverly Park Homeowners Ass'n v. BisnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. In Re Marriage of FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Kaufman v. Diskeeper Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API