Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Freeman
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 22, 2005No. B177397PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EPSTEIN, P. J.
Following her unsuccessful appeal, the trial court imposed an attorney fee sanction against Norda R. Freeman in this long-running family law litigation. The order was made on a Family Code section 271 1 motion of her husband, Donald A. Freeman. 2 Norda challenges the fee award in this appeal. Among other arguments presented is her claim that Donald failed to satisfy the requirement of California Rules of Court, rule 870.2(c), 3 that an application for postjudgment attorney fees incurred on an appeal be filed within the time limitation of that rule. We agree and, since the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- In Re Marriage of LaMusgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Craft v. CraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re Marriage of MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Hollaway v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Falcone v. FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Davenport v. DavenportCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- In Re Marriage of FeldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Parker v. HarbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Bardales v. DuarteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.