Legal Opinion
Henry v. Milonas
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 24, 1998PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs, the elected Surrogate and elected County Court Judge of Ontario County, challenge the constitutionality of Judiciary Law §§ 221-d, 221-e, and 221-f on the ground that the statutorily enacted pay disparity between the County, Family and Surrogate’s Court Judges of Ontario and Monroe Counties violates equal protection. Because plaintiffs have failed to establish that no rational basis exists for the salary disparity, we hold that the provisions of the Judiciary Law are constitutional and therefore reverse.
Plaintiff Frederic T. Henry, Jr., is the duly elected…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Maresca v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Weissman v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cass v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Tolub v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Burke v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Affronti v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- D'AMICO v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Barr v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Matter of Corning Natural Gas Corp. v. Public Serv. Commn. of the State of N.Y.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- Affronti v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.