In re Maximina V.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
The respondent father1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court terminating his parental rights with respect to his daughter. He claims that the trial court improperly concluded that the state had proved, by clear and convincing evidence, the statutory grounds for termination set forth in General Statutes § 17a-112 (b)2 in light of the factors to be *82considered in a termination proceeding as set forth in § 17a-112 (d).* *3
A hearing on a petition to terminate parental rights involves two phases: adjudication and disposition. See Practice Book § 1042.1 et seq. During the adjudicatory phase,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- In re TabithaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In re Rayna M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- In re Christina V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re Tabitha T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Drew R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- In re Alissa N.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Jonathon G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- In re Lauren R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.