Legal Opinion

Oakland Raiders v. National Football League

California Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 2007No. S132814PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KENNARD, J.

Code of Civil Procedure section 657 (hereafter section 657) requires that an order granting a new trial specify not only the ground for the order but also “the court’s reason or reasons for granting the new trial upon each ground stated.” Here, the trial court granted plaintiff The Oakland Raiders’ motion for a new trial on the ground of jury misconduct, but the court failed to set out the required specification of reasons for granting a new trial based on jury misconduct.

Although ordinarily an order granting a new trial is reviewed only for abuse of discretion, the Court of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. George T.California Supreme Court · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. McCoy v. Pacific Maritime Asso.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  3. Bell v. Bayerische Motoren Werke AktiengesellschaftCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Whitlock v. FOSTER WHEELER, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Tun v. Wells Fargo Dealer Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API