Legal Opinion
Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Tanner
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided May 7, 1986No. 85-1286-Civ-T-13PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GEORGE C. CARR, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court upon the motions to dismiss the third-party complaint. The third-party complaint seeks contribution and indemnification from third-party defendants John R. Young and Kenneth Murphy for those claims set out in the original complaint. The motions to dismiss assert, inter alia, that indemnification is not available to the defendant/third party plaintiff, Anthony R. Tanner, and that contribution is not allowable in an action brought under the civil remedy provision of the Federal Racketeering Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c) (“Rico”),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sirota v. Solitron Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Roma Construction Company and Peter Zanni v. Ralph R. ArussoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Nelson v. BennettDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1987
- Riverhead Savings Bank v. National Mortgage Equity Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Wedtech Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Friedman v. HartmannDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.