Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Hartmann
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 30, 1992No. 91 Civ. 1523 (PKL)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
LEISURE, District Judge:
The third-party defendants in this action have moved, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), to dismiss the third-party complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. For the reasons stated below, the motion of the third-party defendants is granted.
Background
I. The Main Action
Plaintiffs have brought this action against defendants for fraud; violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68; conspiracy to violate RICO; conversion; breach of contract; money had and received/unjust…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Roma Construction Company and Peter Zanni v. Ralph R. ArussoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- First American Corp. v. Al-NahyanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- Sequa Corp. v. GelminDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- County of Hudson v. JaniszewskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Burke v. Quick Lift, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.