Legal Opinion

Ramsey v. Mading

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1950No. 31177PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamxey, J.

Plaintiffs, as vendees of certain residential property in Seattle, brought this action for rescission of the executed contract of sale. They alleged that, after taking possession of the premises, the house was found to be in a dilapidated condition. They asserted, as a basis for rescission, that they were the victims of fraud and duress, and that the vendors took an unconscionable advantage of plaintiffs’ disabilities and lack of experience. These allegations were denied by defendants. After a trial to the court, a judgment was entered dismissing the action. Plaintiffs have appealed.

The sale…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. Seattle National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hopper v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Dennis v. McArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. In Re the Estate of QuickWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Seth v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding against HaskellWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. SwensonWashington Supreme Court · 1963

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API