Legal Opinion
Boland v. King County Medical Blue Shield
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 9, 1992No. C92-504DPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DIMMICK, District Judge.
Plaintiff Lyn Boland has brought this action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (ERISA), contesting defendants’ denial of coverage under an employer’s medical plan. Defendants have filed separate motions for summary judgment, but refer to and incorporate each other’s briefs and affidavits and will be referred to collectively as “defendants.” The Boeing Company (“Boeing”) emphasizes contract principles to argue for dismissal. Boeing contends that the plan lan guage and the underlying bargaining…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fred Brown v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Harry Jung, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Fmc Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Ervin B. Madden v. Itt Long Term Disability Plan for Salaried Employees Federal Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Alabama v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Richard H. Heasley, Sr. And Doris G. Heasley v. Belden & Blake CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Mary P. Dahl-Eimers v. Mutual of Omaha Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Taft v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- 17 Employee Benefits Cas. 1888, Pens. Plan Guide P 23893e Morris J. Taft v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society Equitable Financial Company and Does 1 Through 25, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994