Legal Opinion
Koch v. Holder
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 13, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2011-1645PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This employment discrimination matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to state a claim. Defendant Eric H. Holder, Jr., the Attorney General of the United States, filed the motion on March 14, 2012, approximately one year ago. See Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“Def.’s Mot.”), Dkt. No. 6. Pro se plaintiff, Randolph S. Koch, did not file an opposition. On February 15, 2013, the Court issued an Order pursuant to Fox v. Strickland, 837…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Baloch v. KempthorneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- James H. Neal v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Fox v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Koch v. SchapiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Koch v. WalterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Koch v. SchapiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Emrit v. National Institutes of HealthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.