Legal Opinion
Emrit v. National Institutes of Health
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 29, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-2083PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Beryl A. Howell, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The plaintiffs, Ronald Satish Emrit and Nicole Rocío Leal-Mendez, are two residents of Las Vegas, Nevada. They have brought suit pro se against the National Institutes of Health (NIH), the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for alleged violations of the Constitution, the Americans with Disabilities, Act of 1990 (ADA), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 1 In addition, the plaintiffs assert common law…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Magowan v. LoweryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Etokie v. DuncanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Emrit v. DeVosDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2020
- Emrit v. DevosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Emrit v. Holland & Knight, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.