Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Crosby

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 27, 1980No. 50,721PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Parks, J.:

This is an appeal by the plaintiff Pat Barnett from an order granting summary judgment to the defendant AID Insurance Company on an uninsured motorist claim.

The facts are not in dispute. On March 7, 1977, plaintiff was injured when a car driven by defendant Peggy Crosby struck the motorcycle Barnett was riding. Neither Crosby nor her car were insured. Barnett’s motorcycle and his family car were both insured — the car by AID and the motorcycle by Midwest Mutual Insurance Company — but only the policy carried by AID on the car included uninsured motorist coverage.

Barnett brought suit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Hoozer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Forrester Ex Rel. Forrester v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Clayton v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. Adamson v. HillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  5. Midwest Mutual Insurance v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  3. Hillman v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Brackett v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  5. Monteith v. Jefferson Ins. Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API