Hertz Corp. v. Corcoran
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin B. Stecher, J.
Plaintiff moves for summary judgment striking the denials in defendant’s answer and dismissing the first of four counterclaims; and defendant cross-moves for summary judgment on its first counterclaim and dismissing the complaint (CPLR 3212, 3211 [a] [7]).
*404This is an action for a declaratory judgment. As the only issue is one of statutory interpretation, and there is no question of fact or factual interpretation, summary judgment is therefore appropriate as only questions of law are involved.
The issue is whether the collision damage waiver (CDW) offered…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Howard v. WymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jefpaul Garage Corp. v. Presbyterian HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- McAnarney v. Newark Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Atlantic National Insurance v. ArmstrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chabraja v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Luc Leasing Corp. v. MuhlNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- Avis Rent a Car System, Inc. v. CorcoranNew York Supreme Court · 1989