Legal Opinion

Luc Leasing Corp. v. Muhl

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herman Cahn, J.

This is a declaratory judgment action. Plaintiff moves for , summary judgment declaring that the lease completion waiver (LCW) option which it wishes to offer to its leasing customers in New York State as an incident to its leasing of motor *754vehicles, is not insurance within the meaning of Insurance Law § 1101.

The essential facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff is in the business of leasing vehicles under a standard leasing agreement. The normal lease is for a stated period of time and obligates the lessee to make monthly payments throughout the lease term.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MATTER OF AM. TRANSIT INS. CO. v. CorcoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Bowley Associates, Ltd. v. State of New York Insurance DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Barna v. Clifford Country Estates, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932
  4. Hertz Corp. v. CorcoranNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Matter of Allstate Life Ins. Co. v. Superintendent of Ins. of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Safeguard Products International, LLC v. ThompsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API