Legal Opinion
Clement v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 25, 2015No. Nos. 14-AA-343, 14-AA-801PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Senior Judge:
This consolidated appeal concerns the interpretation of D.C.Code § 32-1505(b) (2012 Repl.), specifically whether the phrase “temporary or permanent partial disability” refers to “temporary total” or “temporary partial” disability. Petitioners Royston Clement and Marie Eason requested that the Department of Employment Services (“DOES”) enforce their Workers’ Compensation orders after their employers stopped paying their temporary total disability benefits after 500 weeks. In both cases, the Compensation Review Board (“CRB”) construed § 32-1505(b) to include a 500-week…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- District of Columbia v. Acme Reporting Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Jones v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hiligh v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Williams v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- VILEAN STEVENS & IKE PROPHET v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTHDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- KIRBY VINING v. COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
- Hickerson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
- Hughes-Turner v. D.C. Dep't of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.