Legal Opinion

KIRBY VINING v. COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 2016No. 14-CV-1322PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERLY, Associate Judge:

The District of Columbia’s Freedom of Information Act generally requires public bodies, including the Council of the District of Columbia, to provide “full and complete information” in response to requests for documents from members of the public. D.C.Code §§ 2-531, -532(a) (2015 Supp.). But D.C. FOIA also includes a number of exemptions, which allow public bodies to withhold certain information from disclosure. See D.C.Code § 2-534 (2015 Supp.) (listing exemptions). One of those exemptions allows public bodies to withhold information that is specifically exempted…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States Department of Justice v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  4. Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Eastland v. United States Servicemen's FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kirby Vining v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API