Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Acme Reporting Co.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 31, 1987No. 85-941PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAIR, Senior Judge:
This appeal is from an order of the Tax Division of the Superior Court which held that the court reporting services of appel-lee, Acme Reporting Company (Acme), were improperly taxed by appellant, the District of Columbia (the District).1 The court ordered the refund to Acme of $45,-692.47 plus interest, which amount the court found had been improperly assessed and collected by the District. We affirm.
I
The pertinent facts which, for the most part are undisputed, may be summarized as follows. After an audit of Acme and other companies providing court reporting services, the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Marinopoliski v. IrishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Riggs National Bank of Washington, D.C. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Tax CommissionerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Randolph v. ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CO.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- District of Columbia v. Helen Dwight Reid Educational FoundationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- School Street Associates Ltd. Partnership v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.