Legal Opinion

Danforth, Roos Eppstein v. Levin

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Bexar County; A. W. Seeligson, Judge. Action by N. Levin against Danforth, Roos & Eppstein. Judgment for plaintiff against all the defendants and Judgment over in favor of Wm. Eppstein against his codefendants, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtTaliaferro, J.

N. Levin sued Wm. Epp-stein, Edward Roos, A. H. Danforth, and Bartley Cushing, as partners, in the district court of Bexar county, to recover the sum of $575, balance due him for material supplied and services rendered in making and painting certain scenery to be used upon the stage of a theater in San Antonio, of which the defendants were alleged to be lessees. Defendant Eppstein, by answer, denied under oath the partnership, and alleged that he was, at the time the said scenery was ordered, acting as the agent of Róos and Danforth, who were alone liable for the debt to plaintiff. He further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Long v. GarnettTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. O'Neill v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Merriwether v. HardemanTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Lockhart v. LytleTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Worley v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1901

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. ChipleyTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Chipley v. SmithTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  3. Masterson v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Smith v. ChipleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Watson v. Edinburg Securities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API