Legal Opinion
Watson v. Edinburg Securities Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 31, 1934No. 9250PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY, Justice.
Appellant, C. O. Watson, instituted this suit against appellees, James R. Page, R. A. Rowland, and others, for certain damages alleged to have been sustained by reason, first, of fraudulent representations made with reference to land purchased by him; second, breach of a contract for laying a concrete canal; third, for breach of contract for the care of an orchard.
The jury found against appellant as to the fraud. Judgment was entered by agreement in the sum of $4,700 against B. F. Far-ris and others for the failure to construct the concrete canal, and upon the findings of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Freeman v. Huttig Sash & Door Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
- Fink v. BrownTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
- Kelley Island Lime & Transport Co. v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1906
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Cherokee Village v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Holliday v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Asch v. First National Bank in DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Asch v. First National Bank in DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957