Legal Opinion

Masterson v. Allen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 25, 1934No. 9899PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

The parties will be designated appellant and appellees rather than by the longer appellations appearing in the record.

This briefly stated but merely general statement of the outstanding features appertaining to the nature and result of the suit is taken, in substance, from the appellant’s brief, since it is thought to correctly reflect the proceedings in so far as it goes:

“N. T. Masterson brought this suit in the district court of Harris County to recover from S. M. Allen an amount alleged to be due on k partnership accounting and settlement, including (1) one-half of four…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Faulk v. DashiellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Hanover Nat. Bank of New York v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Phillips v. OverfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  4. Merriwether v. HardemanTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Hardee v. Adams Oil Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bivins v. ProctorTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Mitchell Resort Enterprises, Inc. v. C & S BUILDERS, INC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Mathews v. RyanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  4. Watumull v. EttingerHawaii Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Greene v. Condor Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API