Legal Opinion

State v. Buchholz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1990No. TC 10-87-00725; CA A45808; SC S36317PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

The issue in this murder case is whether the trial court should have ordered the district attorney to offer defendant the same plea bargain offered to his codefendant. The Court of Appeals held that the trial court properly refused to issue such an order. State v. Buchholz, 97 Or App 221, 775 P2d 896 (1989). We affirm.

FACTS

Defendant, Daniel Edward Buchholz, and his friend, Russell Cooper, killed 91-year-old George Small while committing a robbery. Defendant and the victim were acquaintances. Cooper and the victim met for the first time the day before the incident.

Defendant and Cooper spent…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. FreelandOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. City of Salem v. BrunerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. BuchholzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Tanner v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. HaywardOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API