Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. Yates

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 10, 2009No. 07-15087PublishedCited by 231 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:

Anthony Ramirez (“Ramirez”) appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely, arguing that he is entitled to both statutory tolling under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2) and equitable tolling that together would render his petition timely filed; or, in the alternative, to the commencement of a new limitations period under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B) because he was denied access to library materials, which new commencement would also render his petition timely filed. Rejecting his § 2244(d)(1)(B) claim, but concluding that the district court must undertake…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Woodford v. GarceauSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Jackie Ervin Rasberry v. Rosie B. Garcia, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by231 opinions

  1. Armando Sossa v. Ralph M. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Porter v. OllisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Kwai Wong v. David BeebeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. George Gibbs v. Robert LegrandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Chaffer v. ProsperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API