Chaffer v. Prosper
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
ORDER
Appellees’ request to publish the unpublished memorandum disposition is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed September 18, 2009, is modified by changing < known to the parties > to <set forth in Chaffer v. Prosper, 542 F.3d 662, 663-65 (9th Cir.2008),>. So modified, the memorandum disposition is redesignated as a per curiam opinion and is filed concurrently herewith.
The panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges O’Scannlain and Silverman have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc, and Judge Singleton so recommends. The full…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Marsh v. SoaresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Evans v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- In Re SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Waldron-Ramsey v. PacholkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Martin Valdez, Jr. v. W. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Campbell v. HenryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Velasquez v. KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Dearcey Stewart v. Matthew CateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Maxwell v. RoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.