State v. Pittman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.
Defendant joins the state in a petition for reconsideration of our recent decision in State v. Pittman, 275 Or App 518, 365 P3d 142 (2015). At trial, defendant was acquitted of first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415, but convicted of second-degree robbery, ORS 164.405(l)(a), as a lesser-included offense. On appeal, defendant argued that the trial court had erred because second-degree robbery — an offense that had been dismissed at the time of trial — did not constitute a lesser-included offense of first-degree robbery, in the form in which it had been alleged. We agreed with defendant and reversed…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. BarrieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. BecknerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020