Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 18, 2016No. 13C41974; A154792PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevore, J.

Defendant joins the state in a petition for reconsideration of our recent decision in State v. Pittman, 275 Or App 518, 365 P3d 142 (2015). At trial, defendant was acquitted of first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415, but convicted of second-degree robbery, ORS 164.405(l)(a), as a lesser-included offense. On appeal, defendant argued that the trial court had erred because second-degree robbery — an offense that had been dismissed at the time of trial — did not constitute a lesser-included offense of first-degree robbery, in the form in which it had been alleged. We agreed with defendant and reversed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. State v. BarrieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. BurrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. MadisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. State v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  3. State v. BecknerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API