Legal Opinion

State v. Zimmerman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 11, 2000No. 9710-38533; CA A101802PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction after a trial to the court on one count of second-degree robbery, ORS 164.405(1), and one count of unauthorized use of a vehicle, ORS 164.135(1). He argues that the trial court erred in entering judgment on the robbery count and in imposing an unlawful term of post-prison supervision on the robbery count. We agree that the trial court erred in entering judgment on the second-degree robbery count. Our decision makes it unnecessary to address the alleged sentencing error.

The facts are not in dispute. Defendant stole a car, drove to a grocery store,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. BoyumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State v. CoffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. United States v. Alan ShelbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. State v. EnglishCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. McNairCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API