Legal Opinion

State v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 23, 1991No. 89-07-32805; CA A63104PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for solicitation to commit robbery in the first degree. ORS 161.435. He argues that a letter that was not delivered can support, at most, a conviction for attempted solicitation. We agree.

In July, 1989, defendant, while in jail, wrote letters to an acquaintance who was in the Hillcrest Juvenile Center, outlining plans to rob a store and a residence. The letters were intercepted by Hillcrest personnel and never reached their intended recipient. The first intercepted letter stated:

“I wrote about two weeks ago. I guess you didn’t get it. So, I’ll tell you again.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  2. State v. CottonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. State v. AndersonOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Viking Insurance v. PerottiOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AndujarSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
  2. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. People v. SaephanhCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. People v. BoyceIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. EverettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API