Legal Opinion

Collins v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 21, 2017No. 24/16PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, C.J.

“Voir dire,” the French phrase meaning “to say the truth,” describes the preliminary examination of prospective jurors to determine whether they are qualified and suitable to serve as jurors. The voir dire process is critical to ensuring that the courts honor the defendant’s right to an impartial jury guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights. 1

We decide in this case whether the voir dire process reasonably assured that Petitioner, Ruben Arnez Collins, was tried before an impartial jury. We conclude that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Rosales-Lopez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Casey v. Roman Catholic ArchbishopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  3. Burch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Antoine Tyree WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  3. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Kazadi v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  5. Kidder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API