Legal Opinion

Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Telephone Authority v. Public Utilities Commission

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1999No. NonePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) denied the proposed sale of three telephone exchanges from US WEST to the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Telephone Authority (CRSTTA). The circuit court affirmed PUC’s decision. We likewise affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] The Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe is a federally recognized Indian Tribe. CRSTTA, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Tribe, has provided phone service, among other things, principally on the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation since 1958.

[¶ 3.] In early 1994, US WEST, a Colorado corporation which has provided telephone services for a…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Marion v. SchoenwaldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Gettysburg School District 53-1 v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In Re the Conditional Use Permit Granted to Van ZantenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Kermmoade v. Quality InnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Foley v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Real Estate CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API