In Re the Conditional Use Permit Granted to Van Zanten
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Greg and Bev Van Zanten appeal from the circuit court’s decision denying a conditional use permit to construct a hog-finishing unit. We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this decision.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] In the summer of 1997, Van Zan-tens applied to the Lake County Board of Commissioners (County) for a conditional use permit to construct a hog-finishing unit. The building was to house 1,000 to 1,100 hogs and be constructed adjacent to an existing structure already being used for that purpose. A hearing was held on the matter and, on August 19, 1997, the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Public Utility Com'n of Texas v. Gte-SwCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Vellinga v. VellingaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- In Re the State & City Sales Tax Liability of Quality Service Railcar Repair Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Elliott v. Board of County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BergetSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. PiperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Schrank v. Pennington County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BirdsheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.