Legal Opinion

In Re the Conditional Use Permit Granted to Van Zanten

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1999No. 20596, 20632PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Greg and Bev Van Zanten appeal from the circuit court’s decision denying a conditional use permit to construct a hog-finishing unit. We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this decision.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] In the summer of 1997, Van Zan-tens applied to the Lake County Board of Commissioners (County) for a conditional use permit to construct a hog-finishing unit. The building was to house 1,000 to 1,100 hogs and be constructed adjacent to an existing structure already being used for that purpose. A hearing was held on the matter and, on August 19, 1997, the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Petition of Famous Brands, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Public Utility Com'n of Texas v. Gte-SwCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. Vellinga v. VellingaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Cordell v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re the State & City Sales Tax Liability of Quality Service Railcar Repair Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Elliott v. Board of County CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. BergetSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State v. PiperSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Schrank v. Pennington County Board of CommissionersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BirdsheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API