Legal Opinion

In re Cullen

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 23, 1922No. 3576PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, District Judge.

The question in this case is how far a serviceable nag may be ridden, or, less metaphorically, may the so-called “trust receipt,” highly useful in certain kinds of commercial transactions, and which the courts have in consequence struggled to sustain, in spite of its apparent conflict with recording laws, be upheld when the principal, if not the sole, reason for resorting to it, is to escape from those very statutes.

The Commercial Credit Company entered into an elaborate agreement with the Hupp Motor Car Corporation, which, though chartered in Virginia, has its principal…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Century Throwing Co. v. MullerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1912
  2. In re E. Reboulin Fils & Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1908

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McLeod-nash Motors, Inc. v. Commercial Credit TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. In Re Ford-Rennie Leather Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1924
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. KlineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
  4. In re James, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1927
  5. Motor Contract Co. v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API