Legal Opinion
In re James, Inc.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 26, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, District Judge.
This is a motion to confirm the report of the special master in reclamation proceedings. The facts have been stated at length in the special master’s learned, painstaking, and elaborate opinion and there seems no occasion to repeat them.
The special master finds the two trust receipt claimants, the General Motors Acceptance Corporation and the Commercial Investment Trust Company, are not entitled to reclaim the autos by virtue of their so-called trust receipts.' The special master also finds that the chattel mortgages and so-called conditional contracts of sale of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re Bettman-Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
- Arbuthnot v. Central Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1915
- Commerce Trust Co. v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
- In re Post & Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- Dock & Coal Co. v. JustinDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1916
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Houck v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1930
- In Re Alday Motor Co.District Court, D. Tennessee · 1930
- In Re Draughn & Steele Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1931