Motor Contract Co. v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
The Citizens and Southern National Bank filed three petitions for foreclosure of three bills of sale to secure debt on three described automobiles. After levy thereupon by the sheriff, the Motor Contract Company filed three claims to the respective automobiles, alleging title in itself. Upon the trial of the issues the three claim cases were consolidated as one case, and the court, presiding without the aid of a jury, rendered judgment for the claimant. A new trial was granted, and on the second hearing judgment was rendered for the plaintiff in foreclosure. The exception here is to the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In re A. E. Fountain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- McLeod-nash Motors, Inc. v. Commercial Credit TrustSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Scott v. HughesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Ward v. LordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Motor Bankers Corp. v. C. I. T. Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citizens & Southern National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Chattanooga Discount Corporation v. WestDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1963
- Frazier v. O. S. Stapley Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1969