AL Post 763 v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.
The Second District Court of Appeals has decided a series of cases holding that agents of the Enforcement Division of the Department of Liquor Control must identify themselves and their purpose for entry prior to conducting a warrantless administrative search of a class D-4 liquor permit premises. We disagree. Agents may conduct constitutional, warrantless administrative searches of liquor permit premises pursuant to Ohio Adm.Code 4301:1-1-79, without first knocking, announcing their presence, and stating an intent to conduct a search.3
*111WARRANTLESS SEARCHES
“ ‘[T]he underlying command of the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. KelleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. WoljevachOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
- AL Post 763 v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.