William H. Flint v. Carl Hocker, Warden, Nevada State Prison
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
The issue on appeal is this: Do the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Federal Constitution require that an indigent criminal defendant be afforded the assistance of counsel at a Nevada probation revocation hearing? We hold that they do.
On June 1, 1962, Flint pleaded guilty to a first degree burglary charge for which he was sentenced by a state court in Nevada to a term of one to fifteen years. The court suspended the sentence on June 19, 1962, and placed Flint on two years’ probation. On June 2, 1964, the state court held a probation revocation hearing. Flint…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States Ex Rel. John Bey v. Connecticut State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Ex Parte CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. OppeltMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Rahn v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Van Dorn v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- Fairchild v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Raymond Leroy Johnson v. R. Michael CodyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996