Legal Opinion

William H. Flint v. Carl Hocker, Warden, Nevada State Prison

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 24, 1972No. 71-1056PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

The issue on appeal is this: Do the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Federal Constitution require that an indigent criminal defendant be afforded the assistance of counsel at a Nevada probation revocation hearing? We hold that they do.

On June 1, 1962, Flint pleaded guilty to a first degree burglary charge for which he was sentenced by a state court in Nevada to a term of one to fifteen years. The court suspended the sentence on June 19, 1962, and placed Flint on two years’ probation. On June 2, 1964, the state court held a probation revocation hearing. Flint…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States Ex Rel. John Bey v. Connecticut State Board of ParoleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  5. Ex Parte CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. OppeltMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rahn v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Van Dorn v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Fairchild v. Warden, Nevada State PrisonNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Raymond Leroy Johnson v. R. Michael CodyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API