Legal Opinion

Tucker v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 14, 1992No. 23728PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us in our original jurisdiction to determine the constitutionality of S.C. Code Ann. § 12-27-400 (Supp. 1991).

Section 12-27-400 governs use of the 2.66-cent-per-gallon gasoline tax earmarked as “C” construction funds and allows 75% of a county’s apportionment of these funds to be expended for local paving and improvements. The challenged portion of the statute provides:

A majority of the legislative delegation members ... must approve the roads upon which “C” construction funds are to be expended . . . and they may contract for the improvements—

The expenditure of funds…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean v. TimmermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  2. Gunter v. BlantonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1972
  3. Aiken County Board of Education v. KnottsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Bramlette v. StringerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knotts v. S.C. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Thomas v. Cooper River ParkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  3. Vander Linden v. HodgesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  4. Tucker v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Thomas v. Cooper River ParkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API