Tucker v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Moore, Justice:
This case is before us in our original jurisdiction to determine whether S.C. Code Ann. § 12-27-400, as amended effective July 1, 1993, violates article I, § 8, of the South Carolina Constitution. We hold it does not.
Section 12-27-400 governs the use of “C” funds which are generated by a tax on all gasoline sold in this State. In 1992, plaintiff successfully challenged the former version of this statute as a violation of article I, § 8, which safeguards the separation of powers. We held unconstitutional the provisions of § 12-27-400 that required the approval of a county’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Coleman v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- State Ex Rel. Lyon v. BowdenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Gould v. BartonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- Crow v. McAlpineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
- Tucker v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
3Cited by7 opinions
- Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Knotts v. S.C. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Doe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
- Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Doe v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.