Legal Opinion · Dissent

Thomas v. Cooper River Park

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 20, 1996No. 24430Published

1Dissent

Toal, Justice:

I respectfully dissent. The majority, by the mechanical application of rules of statutory construction, has created a monster: fiscal autonomy for a special purpose district which has never been granted such power by the South Carolina Constitution, by statute, or by vote of the people. Because this district has never had this autonomy and because such a result contravenes the very intent of the legislature, I must part with the majority.

It is undisputed the Act 443 is unconstitutional to the extent that it violates the separation of powers provision of the South Carolina…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gilstrap Ex Rel. Gilstrap v. South Carolina Budget & Control BoardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Knight v. SalisburySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. McLeod v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Gould v. BartonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  5. Tucker v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API