Legal Opinion

Amica Mutual Insurance v. Zinck

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 10, 1988No. 87-127PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

The defendants appeal a declaratory judgment granted by the Superior Court {Goode, J.) in favor of Amica Mutual Insurance Company (Amica). The issue is whether the insurance company is obligated to provide coverage for and defend defendant Timothy Zinck as a “person insured” under his parents’ Amica automobile insurance policy with respect to an automobile accident in which Timothy was driving a “nonowned” vehicle. The superior court ruled that Amica was not so obligated, and we affirm.

The “nonowned” vehicle in question was a Ford Econoline van registered in the name of Edward Ritchotte of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Daboul v. Town of HamptonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. Chagnon Lumber Co., Inc. v. DeMulderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. D. W. Clark Road Equipment, Inc. v. Murray Walter, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  5. Carbur's, Inc. v. a & S Office Concepts, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fennell v. Commercial Union Ins.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API