Legal Opinion
Fooshee v. Martin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 21, 1939No. 28459PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
J. Shan Martin, holder of an overdue and unpaid street improvement bond issued by the city of Norman, commenced this action February 7, 1938, by the filing of a petition in which a writ of mandamus was sought to compel the treasurer of said city to pay the principal of said bond together with the delinquent interest due thereon.
From the stipulation of facts, it appears that the bond in question is No. 16 of a series of 21 bonds numbered consecutively, all of which were issued on November 16, 1925. The amount of the principal of each bond is $250, which was due on October 1, 1935. The interest…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Foote v. BartholomewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Koehring ex rel. Martin v. MuemminghoffSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- State ex rel. Brickman v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Lucas v. First Nat. Bank of PawneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- State Ex Rel. Ackerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Heimov v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Sterne, Agee & Leach, Inc. v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- State Ex Rel. Maizels v. JubaOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- People Ex Rel. Scott v. KernerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.