Legal Opinion
Bolger v. Laventhol, Krekstein, Horwath & Horwath
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 1974No. 73 Civ. 5063PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge:
This is a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6), Fed.R.Civ.P., for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Plaintiffs are nineteen limited partners of Takara Partners Limited (Takara), a New York limited partnership which was organized on July 16, 1969, for the purpose of investing and trading in securities. The moving defendants are Laventhol, Krekstein, Horwath & Horwath (Laventhol), an accounting firm which prepared certain financial statements for Takara; Landis & Landis, a New…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,889 Robert Abrahamson and Marjorie Abrahamson v. Malcolm K. FleschnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Gross v. Diversified Mortgage InvestorsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,311 John M. Wilson v. First Houston Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Anderson v. Phoenix Investment Counsel of Boston, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.