Legal Opinion

Ricks v. Nationwide Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 22, 2005PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 We decide whether the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL) prohibits an injured motorist from pleading, proving and recovering the amount of benefits he received from his employer’s workers’ compensation carrier in a subsequent arbitration proceeding where he seeks to recover additional benefits under his own personal uninsured motorist (UM) insurance policy.

¶ 2 The appellant’s decedent, Thomas E. Davis, was injured in a motor vehicle accident caused by an uninsured driver during the course and scope of his employment.1 Davis received workers’ compensation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Geisler v. Motorists Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Standish v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. American Red Cross v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Racicot v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nazarak, S. v. Waite, R., Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Pantelis v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Tannenbaum v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Tannenbaum v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Burke v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API