Tannenbaum v. Nationwide Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
KELLY, J.:
¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order vacating the decision of an arbitration panel in a matter involving Appellee’s underin-sured motorist (UIM) claim against Appellant, his insurer. The question presented is whether benefits derived from self-paid disability coverage duplicate benefits payable under a UIM policy. We find that they do not and affirm.
¶ 2 On December 1, 2000, Appellee, a board certified pediatrician and Assistant Director of Practice at Einstein Medical Center, was rendered permanently disabled by catastrophic injuries suffered in an automobile accident.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Panichelli v. Liberty Mutual Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Standish v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. CordascoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Browne v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Austin v. DionneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tannenbaum v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Pusl v. MeansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Burke v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Smith v. RohrbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Campbell v. SafeCo Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.