Legal Opinion

Tannenbaum v. Nationwide Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 2007PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

KELLY, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from an order vacating the decision of an arbitration panel in a matter involving Appellee’s underin-sured motorist (UIM) claim against Appellant, his insurer. The question presented is whether benefits derived from self-paid disability coverage duplicate benefits payable under a UIM policy. We find that they do not and affirm.

¶ 2 On December 1, 2000, Appellee, a board certified pediatrician and Assistant Director of Practice at Einstein Medical Center, was rendered permanently disabled by catastrophic injuries suffered in an automobile accident.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Panichelli v. Liberty Mutual Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Standish v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. CordascoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Browne v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Austin v. DionneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tannenbaum v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Pusl v. MeansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Burke v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Smith v. RohrbaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Campbell v. SafeCo Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API